|
Message
From: Philipp Klaus Krause<pkk@s...>
Date: Mon Aug 6 21:39:34 CEST 2007
Subject: [oc] GPLv3 usable for open HW
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
gguichal@i... schrieb: > Regarding licensing to use for a HW design, I believe if none of the > licences that are out there satisfy you, then you could actually license > your work under a new license you come up with.
License proliferation is bad, should be avoided if possible; most licenses are incompatible. The free hardware community is probably too small to afford this.
There already are cores released under GPLv2, so if you really want to create a new license make it at least compatible with GPLv2.
Suppose you want to create a SoC from free cores and can't because of incompatible licenses. You'll have to reimplement most of them losing an advantage free stuff (software, hardware, whatever) should give you.
Philipp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGt3iqbtUV+xsoLpoRAvcAAKDX0vMbInXNu0kqm5uA/v1sbf0jEwCguIW9 3vBbM7QVhaugn1hswf4MAZU= =eG/P -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
 |