LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Advertise
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  • Job Opportunity
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Cores > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: Guy Hutchison<ghutchis@g...>
    Date: Wed May 16 19:42:36 CEST 2007
    Subject: [oc] Veilog 2001 cores
    Top
    I haven't seen much relunctance to learn Verilog-2001. Most of it is pretty
    straightforwards, and makes writing your code easier.

    What I have seen is that tool vendors were very slow to add support for 2001
    features, and did so piecemeal, with the result that designers are unwilling
    to use the new features because the benefit is slight (if you've been using
    Verilog a while, you figured out other ways to do the same thing), and it's
    unclear what tools later in the pipeline will break.

    I started using some of the basic 2001 statements 3-4 years ago, and
    although I used only the simplest statements (@* and inline port lists), I
    still ran into problems with tools in the flow that couldn't parse the
    netlist or gave incomplete support.

    Generate? Bah. That's what Perl/Python is for.

    - Guy

    On 5/16/07, Nikolaos Kavvadias <attachment.htm

    ReferenceAuthor
    [oc] Veilog 2001 coresNikolaos Kavvadias

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.