|
Message
From: Miha Dolenc<mihad@o...>
Date: Tue Nov 21 17:12:24 CET 2006
Subject: [oc] Suggested extension to wishbone bus
Hi all!One thought below. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Herveille" <richard@h...> To: <kevin.m.somervill@n...>; "'Discussion list about free open source IP cores'" <cores@o...> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 4:31 PM Subject: RE: [oc] Suggested extension to wishbone bus
> > How do you figure it increases performance? If device A is reading device > B, can device C also write to it? > [rih] That's the basic idea
You can implement one wishbone classic interface for reading and one for writing in device B. DAT_I and DAT_O signals are optional, so it should be allowed. Than it is up to interconnect to allow simultaneous access to both ports.
Regards, Miha Dolenc
> > Not many cores support concurrent access > [rih] Fully agreed, therefore most cores will be non Wishbone Duplex core. > But those few that benefit from the enhanced bus structure can use it. > > > nor do typical bus structures. Are you implying a cross bar type > functionality where device C would write to device D while A is reading B? > [rih] That's up to the system architect. Wishbone does not specify the bus > interconnect. It merely specifies the basic bus architecture. > What kind of interconnect (x-bar, mux, ...) is used is up to the system > architect. > > > Richard > > > _______________________________________________ > http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/cores > > __________ NOD32 1875 (20061121) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.eset.com > >
|
 |