LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Sponsors
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Cores > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: Gyorgy 'nog' Jeney<nog@s...>
    Date: Fri Apr 14 18:29:14 CEST 2006
    Subject: [oc] kindly convert opencores cvs repository to subversion (svn)
    Top
    Jai Dhar <jai.dhar@g...> wrote:
    > I agree, doing everything at once is bad - and I didn't ever advocate
    > that, I was merely speaking on the advantages of SVN. I also think
    > having two repositories is bad. Why not setup a test repository for
    > people to get used to? They can even move their own projects if they
    > like. I don't think getting everyone to move their own projects will
    > work (too messy), but in the meantime, while people are getting used
    > to SVN, duplicate the CVS repo. into SVN.

    You're not advocating doing it wholesale..

    > Then, when people are ready,
    > just point to the new location.

    ...But, actually you are! Realy, I don't see why you're trying to shove this
    down everyone's throaght so badly. If devs want to move their projects, they
    will and if they also leave the CVS repo behind, they'll get all the support
    queries which is _their_ problem, not mine, not yours.

    > I'm not an expert on how to handle IT admin. stuff like this, so
    > that's just one suggestion. But I do feel that you shouldn't hinder
    > the introduction of a new and very beneficial technology when the only
    > deterrant is inconvenience. If there were other detractors, like
    > speed, complexity, cost etc.., then I would say convenience would play
    > a part. But that's not the case with SVN.

    I'm not against it's introduction, I'm against doing it wholesale.

    > I guess it also comes down to two camps of thinking; those who feel
    > that "if it ain't broke, don't fix it", and the opposite.. always
    > pushing to the bleeding edge. Personally, I would like to think that
    > somewhere in the middle is where I am - I waited a while for SVN to
    > mature, and I tried it out even though CVS wasn't "broke". It only
    > increased my productivity, which is always a good thing IMO.

    There _are_ two camps of thinking, just not the ones you mentioned. On one side
    you have those that want to control everything and on the other you find those
    who "couldn't care less". The later has a future, the former doesn't. Just let
    both be and devs will use/convert to whichever suits them best at a time when it
    suits them.

    > End of philosophical rant :)

    Same here :) Have a nice weekend.

    nog.

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.