LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Sponsors
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Cores > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: hbollon at yahoo.fr<hbollon@y...>
    Date: Wed Jan 4 18:40:19 CET 2006
    Subject: [oc] Wishbone in UART16550
    Top

    Hello Francis,

    I search UART16550 vhdl model of verilog Opencores model.
    Do you if anybody have this model ?

    Thanks in advance

    Henri

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Ielsch Francis<Francis.Ielsch@e...>
    To:
    Date: Wed May 4 11:01:03 CEST 2005
    Subject: [oc] Wishbone in UART16550

    > Hello,
    > I'm using the UART16550 core and there is something related to the
    > implementation of wishbone that I disagree with.
    > Under uart_top.v are 2 modules: uart_regs.v and uart_wb.v. Wishbone
    > control signals are only provided to uart_wb.v and uart_regs.v
    > receive
    > address and data buses. I'm upsetted with the fact that uart_regs.v
    > doesn't receive the strobe signal. Thus this module drives the
    > output
    > data bus even if the master isn't talking to it (strobe not
    > asserted for
    > this slave).
    > I know that the wb_dat_i input of the master is a muxtiplexing of
    > the
    > wb_dat_o of all slave so it doesn't disturb when a slave drives its
    > wb_dat_o whereas the master is talking to an other slave. However,
    > I
    > think it would be better that wishbone's slaves doesn't have any
    > activity as long as they are not addressed.
    > As I'm a new Wishbone user, I may be wrong. What are Wishbone
    > Wizards
    > thinking about my opinion ?
    > Regards,
    > Fran6
    > -------------- next part --------------
    > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    > URL: cores/attachments/20050504/ff99b37dattachment.htm
    >
    >

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.