|
Message
From: unmesh<unmesh@s...>
Date: Tue Nov 2 05:25:28 CET 2004
Subject: [oc] XILINX easypath solutions
where I think XILINX saves money is that it needs to only do a functional test of the design with test vectors provided by the designer... so that board testing time which runs out to quite a lot if the complete fpga chip is to be tested. i think its a rather smart way to sell defective dies... one question..does anyone know of any tapeouts on easypath...just curious.. thanks and regards Unmesh
----- Original Message ----- From: <anon@a...> To: <cores@o...> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 9:20 PM Subject: Re: [oc] XILINX easypath solutions
> I don't have experience of Xilinx easypath, but I do have one or two > things to offer in response to your questions: > > Xilinx easypath is a service where Xilinx reduces its post-manufacture > test set to only cover the device's suitability for a particular > bitstream. So, when a product is ready to go to market, the customer > provides Xilinx with their bitstream and it is used to confidently > pass devices that would otherwise be failed. > > A trivial example: A design uses only 80% of the embedded multiplier > units in a Virtex II part. As long as the multipliers made use of are > operational who cares if the other multipliers are working? Note that > if the bitstream changes (e.g. bug correction) there is no guarantee > that it will work on easypath devices passed for the initial bitstream. > > It is interesting to note that over 90% of the programmability in the > routing fabric is effectively "don't care" for any single design. > Usually the device must be tested to ensure that all features are > working before it can be shipped to the customer. > > I would bet Xilinx only offers Easypath on the larger devices. This is > because manufacturing defects increase with the silicon area of the > device. The smaller devices will have close to 100% yield and there is > nothing to be gained from reducing the test set through easypath. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: unmesh<unmesh@s...> > To: > Date: Thu Oct 28 06:52:46 CEST 2004 > Subject: [oc] XILINX easypath solutions > > > Hi All > > if wonder if anyone has any info on XILINX easypath solutions? > > have there been any design tape outs on easypath FPGAs. > > Thanks and regards > > Unmesh > > -------------- next part -------------- > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > URL: attachment.htm > > > > > _______________________________________________ > http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/cores
Scanned by the SecureSynergy VirusScreen Service. For more information log on to : http://www.securesynergyonline.com or http://www.securesynergy.com
|
 |