LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Advertise
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  • Job Opportunity
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Cores > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: markus at reaaliaika.net<markus@r...>
    Date: Tue Aug 17 09:58:30 CEST 2004
    Subject: [oc] Parallel Array Processor Project
    Top
    > i found the forth chip :)
    >
    > http://www.ultratechnology.com/f21.html

    Thanks! I already took a quick look. The F21 could be striped down
    more, when using in the array. There's no need for subroutines, jumps
    and conditionals are enough. Thus, there's no need for PC stack, either.
    The data stack could be decreased, too.

    What increases the complexity, is the neighborhood synchronization - it
    could be HW or SW based, which ever seems to be better. I would
    prefer software-based, because:

    * You would implement only that synchronization mode, which you're
    using in the cell (with HW implementation, you'd need to implement all
    modes to all cells)

    * It could give you possibility to use very complex synchronizations.

    But I'll look it closer and make some scetchs.

    Follow upAuthor
    [oc] Parallel Array Processor ProjectJoachim Strömbergson

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.