|
Message
From: Michael Ayton<mike_ayton@d...>
Date: Wed Jul 14 18:51:48 CEST 2004
Subject: [oc] Why open processors are so much slower than commercial ones?
Microblaze was talor made for Xinilx FPGA devices.... try targeting the
Microblaze to say an Altera device (probably not all that trivial) and see
if there is a difference :)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pablo Bleyer Kocik" <pbk@e...>
To: "Discussion list about free open source IP cores" <cores@o...>
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: [oc] Why open processors are so much slower than commercial
ones?
> At 11:14 2004-07-14, you wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I am working on an eval card for the llc1394 project
> >(http://www.opencores.org/projects.cgi/web/llc1394/overview). I need a
> >compact and fast 32 bit CPU to go along with this core. So far I was not
> >able to identify a good alternative to the MicroBlaze (the board uses a
> >Spartan-3 FPGA). Can someone explain why MicroBlaze seems to be so much
> >faster than any of the free cores out there?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >/Mikhail
>
> Hand-crafted architecture-specific synthesis and placement...
>
> Regards.
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/cores
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.703 / Virus Database: 459 - Release Date: 6/10/2004
|
 |
Browse
