LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Advertise
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  • Job Opportunity
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Cores > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: Pablo Bleyer Kocik<pbk@e...>
    Date: Wed Jul 14 17:37:58 CEST 2004
    Subject: [oc] Why open processors are so much slower than commercial ones?
    Top
    At 11:14 2004-07-14, you wrote:
    >Hi all,
    >
    >I am working on an eval card for the llc1394 project
    >(http://www.opencores.org/projects.cgi/web/llc1394/overview). I need a
    >compact and fast 32 bit CPU to go along with this core. So far I was not
    >able to identify a good alternative to the MicroBlaze (the board uses a
    >Spartan-3 FPGA). Can someone explain why MicroBlaze seems to be so much
    >faster than any of the free cores out there?
    >
    >Thanks,
    >/Mikhail

    Hand-crafted architecture-specific synthesis and placement...

    Regards.


    ReferenceAuthor
    [oc] Why open processors are so much slower than commercial ones?Mikhail Matusov

    Follow upAuthor
    [oc] Why open processors are so much slower than commercial ones?Michael Ayton

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.