LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Sponsors
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Cores > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: arniml at opencores.org<arniml@o...>
    Date: Mon Jul 12 23:11:59 CEST 2004
    Subject: [oc] C16 processor
    Top
    Hi Kevin,

    > The problem also occurs with just the post-translation simulation
    > (not just post-Palce and route).
    > The problem is not dependent on clock rate (it fails even while
    > single stepping at 1Hz in the FPGA).

    So we're not looking at a performance (setup) problem?!

    > so it would seem that the most likely scenario is that the new
    > Xilinx tools interpret the code differently from the simulation.

    Probably yes. Can you make sure that
    a) all sensitivity lists are complete?
    b) signals carrying clocks are not assigned further to signals ("clock
    renaming")?
    c) the functionality of the netlist and the RTL VHDL are equivalent?

    a) and b) are likely to cause different behaviour of the RTL and
    gatelevel (synthesized/translated) designs. c) would discover compiler
    errors but requires a separate tool for formal verification.


    Cheers

    Arnim

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.