|
Message
From: bporcella<bporcella@s...>
Date: Sat May 15 18:32:14 CEST 2004
Subject: [oc] Quick Start on Opensource ASIC design VLSI Tools
Guy & Shehryar:I don't want to get involved in semantics and name calling -- but would like to understand (at least at a high level) the potential value of the Allinace toolset. I generally code in verilog -so have some issues there (independent of which subset of VHDL is supported - and how well that subset is documented) -- but my first impression in looking at the toolset has been that there is no support for timing closure. This is a serious deficiency. Am I missing something?
bj Porcella http://pages.sbcglobal.net/bporcella/
----- Original Message ----- From: "Guy Hutchison" <ghutchis@g...> To: "Discussion list about free open source IP cores" <cores@o...> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 11:12 PM Subject: Re: [oc] Quick Start on Opensource ASIC design VLSI Tools
> > among others Logic Synthesis and place & route tools for standard > > I've played around some with the Alliance tool set, and this statement > is highly misleading. While there are two tools which are called > "logic synthesis", they would not be recognized as a synthesis tool by > most FPGA/ASIC designers. > > The Alliance tools can tackle only a very small subset of VHDL, whose > level of abstraction is roughly that of a gate level description. > Unless something has changed since when I last looked at the tools, > they would not be able to synthesize any of the designs found on > OpenCores. > > The back-end tools are much more complete, although I don't believe > that they are timing-aware. > _______________________________________________ > http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/cores
|
 |