LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Advertise
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  • Job Opportunity
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Cores > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: nico@s...
    Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 15:39:27 +0100 (CET)
    Subject: RE: [oc] verilog or vhdl
    Top

    > On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 17:41, Redant Steven wrote:
    >> Ooops... are we going to hold a VHDL-Verilog war here? :)
    >
    > Hold, on I'm loading right now !
    >
    >> Choosing VHDL over Verilog because Verilog would be more of a standard
    >> is not a good reason.
    >
    > Actually it is.
    
    VHDL was firstly an IEEE standard for Dod, IMHO. Verilog was created by
    Cadence before being an IEEE standard.
    
    <...>
    > Regards,
    > rudi
    
    > If focus is o design ASICs (not FPGAs) and plan on using Synopsys tools,
    > Verilog is a good selection since Synopsys have decided to drop
    > support for VHDL.
    
    No, they can't drop VHDL. Most code from EU are written in VHDL. That
    can't be change so quickly.
    
    They would prefer to support only one langage instead of 2 but customers
    didn't want to loose the use of there "internal" IP.
    
    Nicolas Boulay
    
    
    

    ReferenceAuthor
    RE: [oc] verilog or vhdlRedant Steven
    RE: [oc] verilog or vhdlRudolf Usselmann

    Follow upAuthor
    RE: [oc] verilog or vhdlJoachim strombergson

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.