|
Message
From: Rudolf Usselmann <rudi@a...>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 10:16:16 +0700
Subject: Re: [oc] Erasing INTERNET (Maxim Vlasov)
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 21:04, antti@c... wrote:
...
> Unless we shoot at those big companies as well
> we should not shoot (at least with such heavy ammunition)
> against one person who made something that the community
> does not accept.
This is not a proper nor corresponding comparison. Yes, X & A
might provide shitty free cores, and even shittier commercial
cores, BUT neither one puts deliberate bugs in to their cores.
> Maxim responded once, his email was sure highly over heated,
> but it is also clear that his understanding and expectations from
> OC have been wrong, so he made strong comments based on his
> expectations (from OC). And it as has been pointed out by others
> the terms and conditions are not so clear for anyone.
Maxim, deliberately deceived users of his cores. Further he
lied and tried to twist his story to his advantage. I have
pointed out several of his contradictions in my previous
emails. He knew exactly whet the difference between bugs and
limitations is, and used the proper terms in proper correspondents: When
trying to sell his commercial cores, he was talking about
"bugs", when talking to the OC community, he turned the bugs
in to "limitations".
I feel very strongly that that kind of deception does not
belong at OpenCores, or anywhere else for that matter.
> What makes me wonder even more is that Maxim second posting
> dated 23:45 on 10.10.2003 has also been removed from OC
> forums, what means that whatever he might have said in his
> defence has been made unavailable. People can only read his
> first posting (what he did being in really pissed off mood) and
> then it is possible to read angry emails towards him, with partial
> quotes from Maxim 2nd posting. But not Maxims second posting.
> If I know the russian temperament then I think that Maxim
> was still to much bubbling when he wrote the second posting,
> so it wouldnt surprize me that it have had contained wording
> that makes a forum maintainer to remove the post, but after
> calming down he should have a chance to say something.
Wow, hold on, are you suggesting I should have pity for him
now because he is from Russia and has a "Russian temperament" ?
Oh, no, wait, gee, I'm sure it's my fault again for misinterpreting
everything that people say. You probably did mean what you
wrote. Try writing in Russian next time, I can read enough
of it that I can reply to it as well. And if I get stuck,
I'll get a notarized translator and Linguist to make sure
we interpret the meaning of what you/Maxim are trying to
say. On the second thought don't bother, I think you and
Maxim can find plenty of other excuses and twists to every
word you write ...
Maxim, did lie and did twist his story as he went along.
Period.
rudi
========================================================
ASICS.ws ::: Solutions for your ASIC/FPGA needs :::
..............::: FPGAs * Full Custom ICs * IP Cores :::
FREE IP Cores -> http://www.asics.ws/ <- FREE EDA Tools
|
 |
Browse
