|
Message
From: Bill Cox <bill@v...>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 05:47:19 -0400
Subject: Re: [oc] Xilinx ISE versus Symplify
Kirill 'Big K' Katsnelson wrote:
> Thanks to all who responded! To summarize my impression, symplify
> is a better synthesizer for heavily constrained projects, but is not
> significantly better for laxer ones. I'll give it a new try, pushing
> timing to the limits, and see it in action. By the way, does it mean
> that if area is the concern and not speed, then I am better off with ISE?
I doubt any company is going to catch up with Synplicity on desity. I
worked a bit on the LUT based mapper there. The algorithms Ken invented
blow the stuff I've read about away.
Bill
|
 |
Browse
