|
Message
From: antti@c...
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 09:45:22 +0200
Subject: Re: [oc] Xilinx ISE versus Symplify
No,
if you need are optimized, then at least in some cases synplify
does far better job.
as example xilinx V2PDK reference desings dont fit at all when
trying to use XST :(, synplify should do better (otherwise they
want fit at all)
antti
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kirill 'Big K' Katsnelson" <kkm@d... >
To: cores@o...
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 21:04:22 -0700
Subject: Re: [oc] Xilinx ISE versus Symplify
>
>
> Thanks to all who responded! To summarize my impression, symplify
> is a better synthesizer for heavily constrained projects, but is
> not
> significantly better for laxer ones. I'll give it a new try,
> pushing
> timing to the limits, and see it in action. By the way, does it
> mean
> that if area is the concern and not speed, then I am better off
> with ISE?
>
> Some time ago, Phlei@y... wrote...
> >The ISE 6.1 claimed much better result and more stuff.
>
> Xilinx guys confirmed today that they sent out and my way a trial
> version
> of ISE 6 - so it is already available. Is this the new news? :)
>
> -kkm
>
|
 |
Browse
