Message

Reply | Reply all

Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

From: Héctor Orón Martínez <hecormar@t...>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 20:07:45 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: [oc] PLL vs DLL

Estimado mayank,

Con fecha miércoles, 26 de febrero de 2003, 8:06:29, escribió:

mdb> or the full control on clock delays & clock phases,which 
mdb> architecture is preferrable PLL or DLL.i know tht each one has its 
mdb> advantages,but both altera & Xilinx claims tht their PLL(in 
mdb> stratix) & DLL(in virtex or spartan-IIE) architecture has an edge 
mdb> over other.getting large multiples of frequencies in PLL is also 
mdb> an added advantage.where i can find the comparison between the 
mdb> two.

   I have no answer for your question, but i can tell you DLL are faster and 
better than PLL, the only thing is that PLL have much more resolution than DLL.

   Cheers


mdb> 

-- 
Saludos,
 Héctor Orón                              mailto:hecormar@t...

Follow up	Author
Re: [oc] PLL vs DLL	Richard Herveille