LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Advertise
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  • Job Opportunity
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Cores > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: "Jim Dempsey" <tapedisk@a...>
    Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:24:17 -0600
    Subject: Re: [oc] Beyond Transmeta...
    Top

    
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Martin.J Thompson" <Martin.J.Thompson@t...>
    To: <cores@o...>
    Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 2:07 AM
    Subject: Re: [oc] Beyond Transmeta...
    
    
    >
    > >> you will need also bigger caches, since you have more fine grained
    > >executions,
    > >> etc.
    > >
    > >Not so. There likely would be no cache. A good design could have the
    > >entire working set in some phase of computation (transformation).
    > >
    >
    > I haven't followed this thread too closely, but what happens when an
    interrupt happens?  Do you have to throw away everything in the pipe and
    restart after the interrupt is over?
    >
    
    You are viewing the system as a single point of conciousness. Whereas it is
    better experssed as a mash of items being processed concurrently. An event
    (interrupt) is no different than a carry from an addition. Nothing stops
    everything, only behavior changes.
    
    Jim Dempsey
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    ReferenceAuthor
    Re: [oc] Beyond Transmeta...Martin J Thompson

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.