LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Sponsors
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Usb > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: antti@c...
    Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 14:52:31 +0200
    Subject: [usb] USB 1.1 PHY, DPLL question
    Top

    Hi Rudolf,
    
    assign change = (rxdp_s0 != rxdp_s1) | (rxdn_s0 != rxdn_s1);
    
    the above is used in DPLL but DP and DM signals are inputs
    from single ended reicevers and have totally different tresholds
    as the differential receiver (e.g. RCV pin on tranceiver chip).
    
    if you look with scope or logic analyzer then the bit widths on
    DP and DM may be wrong as much as 40% percent relative to 
    real bit width that under the conditions where RCV signal exposes
    correct bit widths (due to different receiver treshold).
    
    the 'change' signal is be '1' during any change on DP or DM,
    but those changes are not always at the same time. 
    They should be but with real devices they are not. 
    Te signals on DP DM may be actually visually so bad that 
    one wonders why is the signal still received ok. 
    Well the RCV signal is usually OK 
    (if not then of course data transmittion fails already).
    
    so question, why are you using single ended receiver inputs for
    DPLL lock even though those signal may exhibit a real bad jitter?
    
    I would think RCV signal (as the only one having correct transitions
    timing in between bits) would be the signal to use for DPLL lock?
    
    antti
    
    PS I have tested the PHY and I know it works OK with real world
    USB applicances, but the question remains :)
    
    
    
    

    Follow upAuthor
    Re: [usb] USB 1.1 PHY, DPLL questionRudolf Usselmann

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.