|
Message
From: "henry_xb" <xxiaobin@2...>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 9:9:58 +0800
Subject: [usb] Re: usb-digest V1 #239
Hi usb-digest£¡
We are current developing USB2.0 PHY.If any question ,we can discuss it.
Best Regard
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡henry_xb
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡xxiaobin@2...
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡2003-03-19
======= 2003-03-18 12:24:00 in Your email£º=======
> usb@o... usb-digest V1 #239
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Ravi=20Kumar?= <ravikumar_vlsi@y...>
>Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 04:58:43 +0000 (GMT)
>X-Virus: 6
>Subject: [usb] Urgent Reply Solicited
>
>Hi folks.
>I have a query in FSTN(Frame Span Traversal Node ) .
>Is this FSTN for only Interrupt Xfer type or this
>funda holds good for Isochronous also.
>
>
>Am currently working on USB 2.0 project.is there any
>one who has already done a project or currently
>working in USB 2.o related projects Especially in (
>EHCI Project ).
>Pls revert back ASAP.
>
>Regards
>Ravikumar
>
>________________________________________________________________________
>Missed your favourite TV serial last night? Try the new, Yahoo! TV.
> visit http://in.tv.yahoo.com
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>From: "Vishal Namshikar" <vishaln@c...>
>Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 17:18:59 +0530
>X-Virus: 6
>Subject: Re: [usb] Urgent Reply Solicited
>
>FSTN exist in periodic schedules.
>It only has pointers to data structures (not data buffers).
>Moreover Back Path Link Pointer points to a QH (obviously interrupt QH).
>When in recovery path, HC is supposed to ignore siTD and iTD and follow
>their next link pointer.
>Check section 4.12.2.2.1 of EHCI spec.
>regards
>vishaln
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Ravi Kumar" <ravikumar_vlsi@y...>
>To: "grpusb" <usb@o...>
>Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:28 AM
>Subject: [usb] Urgent Reply Solicited
>
>
>> Hi folks.
>> I have a query in FSTN(Frame Span Traversal Node ) .
>> Is this FSTN for only Interrupt Xfer type or this
>> funda holds good for Isochronous also.
>>
>>
>> Am currently working on USB 2.0 project.is there any
>> one who has already done a project or currently
>> working in USB 2.o related projects Especially in (
>> EHCI Project ).
>> Pls revert back ASAP.
>>
>> Regards
>> Ravikumar
>>
>> ________________________________________________________________________
>> Missed your favourite TV serial last night? Try the new, Yahoo! TV.
>> visit http://in.tv.yahoo.com
>>
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>From: "=?GB2312?Q?=C5=E0=BB=F9?=" <hpj99@1...>
>Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 15:23:41 +0800
>X-Virus: 6
>Subject: [usb]
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>From: tangyj@v...
>Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 08:46:52 -0100
>X-Virus: 6
>Subject: [usb] usb2.0 question
>
>2003
>Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
> by www.opencores.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) id h2ICt7Ue016248
> for usb-list; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 11:55:07 -0100
>X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: majordomo set sender to owner-usb@o... using -f
>Received: (from oc@localhost)
> by www.lampret.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id h2H9kq9L020950
> for usb@o...; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 08:46:52 -0100
>Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 08:46:52 -0100
>X-Virus: 6
>Message-Id: <200303170946.h2H9kq9L020950@w...>
>Subject: [usb] usb2.0 question
>To: usb@o...
>From: tangyj@v...
>Sender: owner-usb@o...
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: usb@o...
>
>I have some questions about usb2.0 PHY's digital parts:
>1. Because of bit-unstuff , a 60M clk may be have not enough bit to get
>(may be 7-bit),how can I organize the timing of 480M and 60M?
>2. when receiving,the 480M clk is synchronized to the data,the 60M clk
>is also synchronized to the data?
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>End of usb-digest V1 #239
>-
>To unsubscribe from usb-digest mailing list please visit
http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
|
 |
Browse
