LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Sponsors
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Usb > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: "Peter Teng" <peter_teng@e...>
    Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 13:29:21 -0800
    Subject: RE: [usb] USB 2.0 core Spec. First Draft
    Top

    Rudolf,
    
    	Now I understand the intention of this "number of transaction per uframe"
    register that you are targeting. I first thought that you will use this only
    for control responses. And I was thinking about USB 1.1. Sorry.
    
    If you don't see my response within 24 business hours to your email, please
    email me using pteng@m..., pteng@y... or peter_teng@e..., or
    please call me direct. Sorry in advance for the trouble that may caused you.
    
    best regards,
    "Peter" Chu Tin Teng
    Computing technology I/O Group
    NEC Electronics Inc.
    Physical address
    3301 Olcott St.,
    Santa Clara, CA 95054
    
    Mailing address
    Olcott Building
    2880 Scott Blvd., M/S: SC2302
    P.O. Box 58062
    Santa Clara, CA  95052-8062
    Tel: (408)9692766
    Fax: (408)9692435
    Email: peter_teng@e.../pteng@m...
    
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Rudolf Usselmann [mailto:rudi@a...]
    Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 9:26 PM
    To: usb@o...; Peter Teng
    Subject: Re: [usb] USB 2.0 core Spec. First Draft
    
    
    on 1/11/01 10:19, Peter Teng at peter_teng@e... wrote:
    
    > Rudolf,
    >
    > I would like to make clear that "number of transaction per uframe"
    register
    > is not needed for PID checking. The PID checking or generation are done
    > differently (see 8.6 of USB 2.0 spec for more detail).
    
    Peter, I have read section 8.6. Please take a look at section 5.9 through
    5.9.2. There it talks about high speed, high bandwidth endpoints, and PID
    toggling based on how many transactions per micro frame are used.
    
    Thanks,
    rudi
    
    > I don't understand what you meant by "I dropped the S bit as it would
    > introduce to much of a latency!"
    >
    > If you don't see my response within 24 business hours to your email,
    please
    > email me using pteng@m..., pteng@y... or peter_teng@e...,
    or
    > please call me direct. Sorry in advance for the trouble that may caused
    you.
    >
    > best regards,
    > "Peter" Chu Tin Teng
    > Computing technology I/O Group
    > NEC Electronics Inc.
    > Physical address
    > 3301 Olcott St.,
    > Santa Clara, CA 95054
    
    
    
    

    ReferenceAuthor
    Re: [usb] USB 2.0 core Spec. First DraftRudolf Usselmann

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.