|
Message
From: Jeremy Bennett<jeremy.bennett@e...>
Date: Thu Jul 17 10:04:07 CEST 2008
Subject: [openrisc] What tag version of the RTL should I use that
matches the or1k-sim?
The latest stable release of Or1ksim is 0.2.0, which is available as a
single compressed file on the download page. You will find further
patches and guidelines on how to build it in the Embecosm application
note #2 at:
http://www.embecosm.com/download.html
It represents a work in progress, but little work has been done for 3
years. However it is good enough to run Linux 2.6.19 kernel and the
BusyBox utilities (see the work at Rich D'Addio's Meansoffreedom
website, http://meansoffreedom.com/).
I am working on a small update, which will fix some bugs and also
provide a library version of the interface. That work will be committed
to CVS in the next week or two - once I have it working GDB 6.8.
There are plenty of bugs still to be found. Feel free to post any
discrepancies you find from your comparison, and I'll try to fix them.
Better still feel free to post your own fixes!
HTH,
Jeremy
-
Tel: +44 (1202) 416955
Cell: +44 (7970) 676050
SkypeID: jeremybennett
Email: jeremy.bennett@e...
Web: www.embecosm.com
-----Original Message-----
From: depaulfm@c...
Reply-To: List about OpenRISC project <openrisc@o...>
To: openrisc@o...
Subject: [openrisc] What tag version of the RTL should I use that
matches the or1k-sim?
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:47:14 +0200 (CEST)
I used the "Basic Custom OpenRisc System Hardware Tutorial" (from the
or1200 web-site) as a guide to start-up my work. The tagged RTL is
from 1/1/04. The or1ksim-0.2.0rc2 is almost 2 years younger than that
tag.
Why I care? I want to have an RTL simulation working and, to make sure
is correct, I would compare it w/ the output of the arch. simulator.
Is it really safe to use the 1/1/04 version?
Thanks,
_______________________________________________
http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/openrisc
|
 |
Browse
