|
Message
From: Matjaz Breskvar<phoenix@o...>
Date: Thu Jun 30 13:48:02 CEST 2005
Subject: [openrisc] binutils, gcc, or1ksim patches #108-#127, gdb patch
* Robert Millan (rmh@a...) wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 02:31:04AM +0200, Matjaz Breskvar wrote:
> > or1ksim patches #108-#127 are all accepted (gdb one provided that we don't
> > get a negative feedback).
> >
> > i'm not sure about #107, but i don't feel strongly against it...
> >
> > i've alredy applied the binutils and gcc config patches, so as far as i know
> > my patch queue is now empty (sorry Robert that you waited so long).
>
> No problem. Perhaps I should be using the tracker instead of sending patches
> to the list?
i've seen somewhere (don't remember exactly where) a web based system where
you can submit a patch and after it's approved it goes automatically into
cvs. very low overhead for developers and patches don't get lost...
> > feel
> > free to correct me if i missed something, somewhere...
>
> Yes, you missed a pair of them. In binutils, you applied the e_machine patch
> but not the "or32-linux-gnu" one. In gcc-3.2, you applied the "or32-linux-gnu"
> patch but not the YYMALLOC one (fixes broken build).
>
> gcc-3.4 is fine (except the l.load32u thing for which I didn't send a patch).
>
> I'm re-attaching both so you don't have to search again.
thank you. i commited them now.
best regards,
p.
|
 |
Browse
