|
Message
From: Matjaz Breskvar<phoenix@o...>
Date: Thu Jun 30 13:21:42 CEST 2005
Subject: [openrisc] binutils, gcc, or1ksim patches #108-#127, gdb patch
* Gy?rgy 'nog' Jeney (nog@s...) wrote:
> > or1ksim patches #108-#127 are all accepted (gdb one provided that we don't
> > get a negative feedback).
> >
> > i'm not sure about #107, but i don't feel strongly against it...
> >
> > i've alredy applied the binutils and gcc config patches, so as far as i know
> > my patch queue is now empty (sorry Robert that you waited so long). feel
> > free to correct me if i missed something, somewhere...
>
> I didn't hear anything about patches #105 and #106:
> http://www.opencores.org/forums.cgi/openrisc/2005/06/001580
> http://www.opencores.org/forums.cgi/openrisc/2005/06/001582
uh, i didn't see those (i had some email problems at that time).
i see now where you got the cpu_state.sprs[...] idea. i can not argue with
such performance increase. (also go ahead and commit the #107 in unchanged
form, since exposing the cpu_state.sprs[...] in one place makes it kind of
without a point hidding it elsewhere...)
#105, #106 should be commited. great work on #105 !
best regards,
p.
|
 |
Browse
