|
Message
From: Robert Millan<rmh@a...>
Date: Wed Jun 29 13:09:03 CEST 2005
Subject: [openrisc] status of OpenRISC
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 04:05:13PM +0200, Johan Rydberg wrote:
> >> It should not be too hard to get the or32 target (I really dislikes
> >> the or32 name; and I know some of the binutils hackers did as well) up
> >> to date once again. Though my time is very limited right now.
> >
> > hm, what can we do about or32 name ? i don't think we want to change name
> > now, but to even consider it what would be the alternative ('openrisc', just
> > 'or',...)
>
> I'm not sure we can do anything at this point. But my personal
> preference has always been "openrisc".
It should be pointed out that config.sub is not properly ported and will fuck
up "or32" triplet names:
rmh at aragorn:~$ /usr/share/misc/config.sub openrisc-unknown-linux
openrisc-unknown-linux-gnu
rmh at aragorn:~$ /usr/share/misc/config.sub or32-unknown-linux
or32-unknown-coff
This will break autoconf scripts when building things natively. So if you are
going to use "or32", this should be sorted out. I sent a mail about config.sub
before, with a patch that solves this problem. I'm re-attaching it.
(This patch also maps openrisc to or32. In case you end up using openrisc, the
mapping should be reverted in config.sub)
If there's consensus on this, I'd like to have your approval for sending this
to the config.sub maintainer.
--
Robert Millan
-------------- next part --------------
--- /usr/share/misc/config.sub 2005-04-24 22:01:25.000000000 +0200
+++ ./config.sub 2005-06-22 23:24:41.000000000 +0200
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@
| mn10200 | mn10300 \
| msp430 \
| ns16k | ns32k \
- | openrisc | or32 \
+ | or32 \
| pdp10 | pdp11 | pj | pjl \
| powerpc | powerpc64 | powerpc64le | powerpcle | ppcbe \
| pyramid \
@@ -761,9 +761,8 @@
basic_machine=hppa1.1-oki
os=-proelf
;;
- or32 | or32-*)
+ openrisc | openrisc-*)
basic_machine=or32-unknown
- os=-coff
;;
os400)
basic_machine=powerpc-ibm
|
 |
Browse
