|
Message
From: György 'nog' Jeney<nog@s...>
Date: Mon Mar 28 13:53:54 CEST 2005
Subject: [openrisc] or1ksim patches #34-#67
> sim-config.o(.text+0x1a18): In function > arse_args': > /center/opencores/toolchains/tmp/or1ksim-20050328/sim-config.c:232: undefined > reference to arse_dbchs' > sim-cmd.o(.text+0xb9a): In function im_cmd_setdbch': > /center/opencores/toolchains/tmp/or1ksim-20050328/sim-cmd.c:433: undefined > reference to arse_dbchs'
Can you check wether support/debug.c actually gets built? It appears like automake doesn't do its usual rebuild of the makefile when an Makefile.am changes.
> > > #45 accepted, please make a comment somewhere appropriate that one shouldn't > > > assume except_handle returns. i might have additional comments later on. > > > > Is the attached patch ok? Or were you thinking about something else? > > Attached patch is ok, but i would really like to see > an addon patch documenting except_handle behaviour (that it may no return).
Since the attached patch was not documenting it to your likeing, were do you want it docuemnted? (I'm a bit confused here, since the attached patch does document the behaviour)
> > > #50 accepted. (why is "enabled = 1" line removed. how can one easily disable > > > some device ?) > > > > Don't have the section in the config file. If this is a wanted behaviour then > > I could readd it... > > I'd want old behaviour.
Ok, it's on my TODO list.
nog.
|
 |