|
Message
From: =?unknown-8bit?Q?Gy=F6rgy?= 'nog' Jeney<nog@s...>
Date: Mon Feb 21 15:03:03 CET 2005
Subject: [openrisc] x86_64 linux [more&more]
> > this is an interesting diff between i386 and x86-64 generated assembly...
> > the 268435456 just happens to be 0x10000000, so it's the upper part of
>
> No, it takes the whole 64 bit part, not just the upper or lower.
>
> > 1152921504606846976. My really wild guess would be that some code assumes
> > target register size = host register size...
> Yes, something like. Would be nice to know where, and to constrain this to 32 bit lower part,
> and ignore in rest. Who write these piece of code in /or32 ?
If it is really that only the low 32 bits gets written to some 64-bit variable
and the rest is left uninitialised, I would say that it is worth a try to run
gcc through valgrind. It should pinpoint this error with ease.
nog.
|
 |
Browse
