|
Message
From: Matjaz Breskvar<phoenix@o...>
Date: Tue Jun 8 03:44:03 CEST 2004
Subject: [openrisc] l.mulu problem
* whli_interqos@y... (whli_interqos@y...) wrote: > > Sorry for typing mistake. It is for l.mulu. Do you have any problem with > l.mulu when you run it on the simulator? If you do, what is it? How do > you fix it ? Thank you very much.
haven't tried it. so can you please post output from simulator (and possibly a short testcase where it fails) and i'll put it on my TODO list.
regards, p. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Matjaz Breskvar<phoenix@o...> > To: > Date: Mon Jun 7 13:01:50 CEST 2004 > Subject: [openrisc] l.mulu problem > > > * whli_interqos@y... (whli_interqos@y...) wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > I wrote an assembly code with l.mulu and ran in the openrisc > > > simulator. I found that the simulator aborted abnormally when > > it run l.mul > > was that for the l.mul or l.mulu? (i didn't have any problems with > > simulation of l.mul) > > > instruction. I wounder if the simulator does not support it? > > By the way, > > > which of c code will generate l.mulu operation? I tried the > > following > > > codes, but it didnot generate the l.mulu operation. > > > unsigned int a; > > > unsigned int b; > > > unsigned int c; > > > c = a * b; > > > > > > Can anyone tell me? > > you are right, the gcc generates just 'l.mul' and not 'l.muli' > > or 'l.mulu'. > > regards, > > p. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/openrisc
|
 |