|
Message
From: Damjan Lampret<damjanl@o...>
Date: Sat May 15 00:52:07 CEST 2004
Subject: [openrisc] 1 bit condition code register
Actually, I was doing a lot of analysis in 1999 looking at the Alpha model and comparing it to the traditional model of flags. If you remember at the time I defined only one true flag and that is "F" flag; the one set by sfXX instructions. Everything else like CY came later and these are not real flags... The alpha model doesn't have much advantage.
regards, Damjan
----- Original Message ----- From: "Johan Rydberg" <jrydberg@g...> To: "List about OpenRISC project" <openrisc@o...> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 11:48 AM Subject: Re: [openrisc] 1 bit condition code register
> > On Fri, 14 May 2004, kavi wrote: > > : As the developers state, this permits for higher performance in terms of > : cycle time > : as well as deeper pipelines. > > That might very well be true, but I'm afraid that it's a bit too late > to change the OpenRISC 1000 ISA. > > ~j > _______________________________________________ > http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/openrisc >
|
 |