LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Advertise
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  • Find Resources
  • Job Opportunity
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Openrisc > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: kevinlinsun@h...<kevinlinsun@h...>
    Date: Wed May 5 11:37:57 CEST 2004
    Subject: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock = 1:1?
    Top
    thank you.i'll try once more.
    best regards,
    kevin

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Damjan Lampret<lampret@o...>
    To:
    Date: Tue May 4 19:22:54 CEST 2004
    Subject: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC clock =
    1:1?

    > Quoting or1200_defines.v
    >
    > // If you plan to run WB:RISC clock fixed to 1:1, disable
    > // both defines
    > In general however I'd recommend you to enable
    > OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED
    > and disable (comment out)
    > OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED
    > and set clmode_i port to 2'b00.
    > regards
    > Damjan
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: <kevinlinsun@h...>
    > To: <openrisc@o...>
    > Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 7:09 PM
    > Subject: Re: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC
    clock
    > = 1:1?
    > > Hi
    > > Thanks for your reply.
    > > but i just want to make WB:RISC clock = 1:1.how should i do?
    > >
    > > best regards,
    > > kevin
    > >
    > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > From: Damjan Lampret<lampret@o...>
    > > To:
    > > Date: Mon May 3 11:59:14 CEST 2004
    > > Subject: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC
    > clock =
    > > 1:1?
    > >
    > > > Kevin
    > > >
    > > > you first have to learn to read the comments in front of
    > defines.
    > > > or1200_defines.v says:
    > > > //
    > > > // Clock ratio RISC clock versus WB clock
    > > > //
    > > > // If you plan to run WB:RISC clock fixed to 1:1, disable
    > > > // both defines
    > > > //
    > > > // For WB:RISC 1:2 or 1:1, enable
    > OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED
    > > > // and use clmode to set ratio
    > > > //
    > > > // For WB:RISC 1:4, 1:2 or 1:1, enable both defines and
    > use
    > > > // clmode to set ratio
    > > > `define OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED
    > > > //`define OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED
    > > > Conclusion: for 1:4 you need to enable both defines. Why
    > are you
    > > > commenting
    > > > out OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED??
    > > > regards,
    > > > Damjan
    > > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > > From: <kevinlinsun@h...>
    > > > To: <openrisc@o...>
    > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 6:00 AM
    > > > Subject: [openrisc] Is there something wrong when WB:RISC
    > clock =
    > > > 1:1?
    > > > > Hi
    > > > > When i comment "`define
    > OR1200_CLKDIV_2_SUPPORTED"
    > > > > and "`define OR1200_CLKDIV_4_SUPPORTED" or
    > set
    > > > clmode_i = 2'b00,
    > > > > the system seems to be in a wrong state.Who can tell
    > me how to
    > > > make
    > > > > WB:RISC clock = 1:1?
    > > > >
    > > > > best regards,
    > > > > kevin
    > > > > _______________________________________________
    > > > > http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/openrisc
    > > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > _______________________________________________
    > > http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/openrisc
    > >
    >
    >

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.