|
Message
From: Matjaz Breskvar<phoenix@o...>
Date: Wed Jan 28 02:30:57 CET 2004
Subject: [openrisc] gcc-3.2.3 bugs after merge
* Scott Furman (sfurman@r...) wrote:
> Damjan Lampret wrote:
>
> >I think having so many different compilers is causing a little bit of mess.
> >Anyone disagrees if older versions of gcc are removed from opencores cvs?
> >(maybe not removed but at least moved to some special directory obsolete),
> >I'm thinking versions OC 2.95.2 and OC 3.1 should be (re)moved and OC 3.2.3
> >should become the official version. We also have to merge the UC version.
> >
> >
> I agree in principal, but I suggest that we need to feel confident that
> the newer compilers work at least somewhat correctly w/ linux, eCos,
> uClinux, etc, before retiring the old compilers. If I'm interpreting
> Matjez's experiments correctly, it doesn't seem like we're in that
> position yet...
The most important goal is to have a Stable toolchain, i do not care
much about what is it's origin much. By that i do not mean that it
builds just ecos fine but also at least linux & uclinux. The problem right
now is that every compiler we have has some (small) problems here or there.
Right now i'm going to try gcc-3.1 with Scott's patch and it if works
ok for ecos & uclinux & linux i'll be very tempted to use that one.
(porting to newer stable versions of gcc is not problematic at all)
regards,
p.
|
 |
Browse
