LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Advertise
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  • Find Resources
  • Job Opportunity
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Openrisc > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: Scott Furman<sfurman@r...>
    Date: Tue Jan 27 21:38:33 CET 2004
    Subject: [openrisc] gcc-3.2.3 bugs after merge
    Top
    Damjan Lampret wrote:

    >I think having so many different compilers is causing a little bit of mess.
    >Anyone disagrees if older versions of gcc are removed from opencores cvs?
    >(maybe not removed but at least moved to some special directory obsolete),
    >I'm thinking versions OC 2.95.2 and OC 3.1 should be (re)moved and OC 3.2.3
    >should become the official version. We also have to merge the UC version.
    >
    >
    I agree in principal, but I suggest that we need to feel confident that
    the newer compilers work at least somewhat correctly w/ linux, eCos,
    uClinux, etc, before retiring the old compilers. If I'm interpreting
    Matjez's experiments correctly, it doesn't seem like we're in that
    position yet...

    -Scott


    Follow upAuthor
    [openrisc] gcc-3.2.3 bugs after mergeMatjaz Breskvar

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.