LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Advertise
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  • Find Resources
  • Job Opportunity
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Openrisc > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: James Morrison<ja2morri@c...>
    Date: Tue Jan 27 14:23:53 CET 2004
    Subject: [openrisc] gcc-3.2.3 bugs after merge
    Top

    "Damjan Lampret" <lampret@o...> writes:

    > Hi All !
    >
    > I think having so many different compilers is causing a little bit of mess.
    > Anyone disagrees if older versions of gcc are removed from opencores cvs?
    > (maybe not removed but at least moved to some special directory obsolete),
    > I'm thinking versions OC 2.95.2 and OC 3.1 should be (re)moved and OC 3.2.3
    > should become the official version. We also have to merge the UC version.
    >
    > regards,
    > Damjan
    >

    I agree with this. However, for the UC version why don't we try to get
    this merged into gcc. For this to happen anyone who has commited more
    than about 10 lines of code to the port will need to get a copyright
    assignment from the FSF. If the previous step is possible, we could then
    merge our code into gcc mainline and backport it to the 3.4 branch.

    James A. Morrison

    ReferenceAuthor
    [openrisc] gcc-3.2.3 bugs after mergeDamjan Lampret

    Follow upAuthor
    [openrisc] gcc-3.2.3 bugs after mergeScott Furman

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.