OPENCORES.ORG

Thanks Damjan,
I am having the following problem on doing "make all":
/foo/gnu/bin/autoconf:
/afs/bp.foo/contrib/gnu/bin/autom4te: /local/bin/perl:
bad interpreter: No such file or directory
/foo/gnu/bin/autoconf:
/afs/bp.foo/contrib/gnu/bin/autom4te: Success
configure.in: no proper invocation of AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE
was found.
configure.in: You should verify that configure.in
invokes AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE,
configure.in: that aclocal.m4 is present in the
top-level directory,
configure.in: and that aclocal.m4 was recently
regenerated (using aclocal).
Makefile.am: installing `./depcomp'
/afs/bp.foo/contrib/gnu/share/automake-1.7/am/depend2.am:
am__fastdepCC does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL
/afs/bp.foo/contrib/gnu/share/automake-1.7/am/depend2.am:
AMDEP does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL
Makefile.am: C source seen but `CC' is undefined
Makefile.am:
Makefile.am: The usual way to define `CC' is to add
`AC_PROG_CC'
Makefile.am: to `configure.in' and run `autoconf'
again.
make: *** [Makefile.in] Error 1

cat /proc/version gives:
Linux version 2.4.18-5smp
(bhcompile@d...) (gcc version 2.96
20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.3 2.96-110)) #1 SMP Mon Jun
10 15:19:40 EDT 2002

Any help appreciated!
LEARNER

--- Damjan Lampret <lampret@o...> wrote:
> 
> 
> > Matt, How do I do get the CVS version?
> 
> > > > the stable version it says Requested Item Not
> > > Found.
> > > > I downloaded the development version..however
> > > could
> > > > not build it. Am I supposed to build on a
> specific
> > > > platform? I tried on both SUN and Linux
> > > machines..but
> > > > to no avail.
> 
> "Stable" version is nothing else but the latest
> version fro mthe cvs that
> was built successfully and ran uclinux. But it seems
> that the ATS is not
> tagging cvs anymore with this tag. I need to check
> why is this so.
> Developmnent version is nothing else but cvs version
> HEAD, that is the
> latest cvs version. Typically development version
> and stable version should
> be the same. Using the download link on the web in
> fact takes it directly
> fro mthe cvs. So the question is why your
> development version didn't build.
> Because if that one didn't build using cvs client
> and taking it from the cvs
> will mean you get the same sources as before and
> technically they shouldn't
> build if the previous didn't build. Anyway it should
> build on Linux, at
> least on Red Hat 7.3 and Red Hat 9.0. People also
> built it on all kinds of
> other systems as well.
> 
> regards,
> Damjan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/openrisc

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Find out what made the Top Yahoo! Searches of 2003
http://search.yahoo.com/top2003