LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Advertise
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  • Find Resources
  • Job Opportunity
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Openrisc > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: Matjaz Breskvar <phoenix@o...>
    Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:43:22 +0100
    Subject: Re: [openrisc] gdb stub instead of JTAG?
    Top

    * Damjan Lampret (lampret@o...) wrote:
    > I strictly use GCC 3.1 from opencores cvs. I don't use any other derivatives
    > that other folks have been making.
    > 
    > I don't use any special flags just -O2 together with flags that don't have
    > anything to do how the code gets compiled (like -c and -o for example)
    > 
    > I didn't have any problems with conditional branches.
    
    opencores gcc-3.2.3 should be fine too (i think it even solved a few
    problems for some people).
    
    i can say that when porting linux i started
    with -O2 optimizations and never had problems with it. then i've switched
    to -O just to be safe. i did try to turn it back at some milestones and it
    worked ok. (i'm using gcc-3.2.3 from opencores cvs)
    
    i'm going to recompile linux with -O2 and report what happens.
    
    regards,
    p.
    
    
    

    ReferenceAuthor
    RE: [openrisc] gdb stub instead of JTAG?Robert Cragie
    Re: [openrisc] gdb stub instead of JTAG?Damjan Lampret

    Follow upAuthor
    Re: [openrisc] -O2 problemMatjaz Breskvar

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.