LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Advertise
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  • Find Resources
  • Job Opportunity
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Openrisc > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: "Damjan Lampret" <lampret@o...>
    Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 16:29:08 +0200
    Subject: Re: [openrisc] RTL tests
    Top

    Hi,
    
    if you download orp_soc, you can run SW test cases found in orp_soc/sw
    either with command orp_soc/sim/bin/run_rtl_regression to run it on verilog
    simulator, or with orp_soc/sim/bin/run_sw for running test cases on or1ksim.
    
    But I'm definately all for it to expand the test cases, or even create a new
    environment if you have created an environment already.
    
    regards,
    Damjan
    
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: "Brian Korsedal" <BKorsedal@b...>
    To: <openrisc@o...>; <openrisc@o...>;
    <openrisc@o...>
    Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 4:01 AM
    Subject: [openrisc] RTL tests
    
    
    > Hi,
    >
    > I was wondering if there has been any work to run software/hardware co-sim
    > for the or1k.  I did some work where we did the hardware if verilog and
    did
    > an extensive verification enviroment in C.  We ran it all on a verilog
    > simulator.
    >
    > I was thinking that it would be nice to use the actual RTL instead of the
    > or1k sim.  It would probably be a lot LOT slower but it would still be
    > really nice.  Maybe get most of the work done with the or1k sim and then
    run
    > the RTL simulator to be sure it all works.
    >
    > Anyway, has there been any work done twoards this?  If not, what simulator
    > should it be written for?  I was thinking Icarus Verilog because it's
    free.
    >
    >
    > -Brian
    >
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: owner-openrisc@o... on behalf of Brian Korsedal
    > Sent: Mon 9/8/2003 1:43 PM
    > To: openrisc@o...; openrisc@o...
    > Cc:
    > Subject: RE: [openrisc] Where to get source files?
    >
    >
    > I'll try to compile and set the one from uclinux.  If I can do it and
    > everything works good, I'll post the results here.  It might take me a few
    > days or a week or so.
    >
    > -Brian
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Damjan Lampret [mailto:lampret@o...]
    > Sent: Mon 9/8/2003 1:26 PM
    > To: openrisc@o...
    > Cc:
    > Subject: Re: [openrisc] Where to get source files?
    > I don't know which one is better, but I can tell you that the one from
    > opencores cvs runs for sure. See this:
    > http://www.opencores.org/cores/or1k/ats/or32-uclinux/or1ksim_uclinux.txt
    >
    > You can also try from uclinux.org, maybe yoiu can do a diff a report if
    > there are differences. Anyway I'm all for it to remove the one from
    > opencores cvs if they are the same (so that people will not get confused).
    > The main reason for having a copy in opencores cvs is during development
    > when changes are often and it is difficult to send patches to official
    site
    > all the time (maintainers get tired of you ;-)
    >
    > regards,
    > Damjan
    >
    > ----- Original Message ----- 
    > From: "Brian Korsedal" <BKorsedal@b...>
    > To: <openrisc@o...>; <openrisc@o...>
    > Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 10:08 PM
    > Subject: RE: [openrisc] Where to get source files?
    >
    >
    > > I was just looking over at the uClinux.org
    > > (http://www.uclinux.org/pub/uClinux/dist/)
    > > site and they have 'OPENcores OR1000' support.  Which one is better, the
    > > files from cvs@opencores or the ones from uclinux.org?  The files are
    > dated
    > > 22 May 2003 for uclinux.org.
    > >
    > > I think the uclinux.org release is the most recent stable source code.
    > > Anyone know which one is better?
    > >
    > > -Brian
    > >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: Damjan Lampret [mailto:lampret@o...]
    > > Sent: Mon 9/8/2003 11:33 AM
    > > To: openrisc@o...
    > > Cc:
    > > Subject: Re: [openrisc] Where to get source files?
    > > Hi,
    > >
    > > some of the files where takene from official sites, modified and then
    > > imported into the cvs (1.1.1.1). I don't remember which packages and
    > amount
    > > of their changes. In general those that are mainly 1.1.1.1 do not change
    > > much from originals. The simplest way is to compare the original files
    and
    > > the one in opencores cvs.
    > >
    > > There is now also plan to move as much as possible of openrisc toolchain
    > > into official sources trees of gcc, binutils (at GNU/FSF), same for
    linux.
    > > Something similar I think is already the case for eCos.
    > >
    > > regards,
    > > Damjan
    > >
    > > ----- Original Message ----- 
    > > From: "Brian Korsedal" <BKorsedal@b...>
    > > To: <openrisc@o...>
    > > Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 8:23 PM
    > > Subject: [openrisc] Where to get source files?
    > >
    > >
    > > > Hi,
    > > >
    > > > I was looking around in the CVS directory and checking out the dates
    and
    > > > release numbers for some of the files.  It seems that some things,
    like
    > > > uclibc and newlib the files were very old and not modified (version
    > > > 1.1.1.1).
    > > >
    > > > I was curious if these sources are different than those that can be
    > found
    > > at
    > > > the website of the project.  Such as, will I find newer source code
    from
    > > the
    > > > newlib project page?  If so, what changes need to be made for the
    or1k?
    > > Is
    > > > it just compile and install options that have to be different or are
    > there
    > > > changes to the souce code.
    > > >
    > > > Thanks,
    > > >
    > > > Brian
    > > >
    > >
    > > 
    > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    > 
    >
    >
    >
    
    
    
    

    ReferenceAuthor
    [openrisc] RTL testsBrian Korsedal

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.