|
Message
From: Richard Prescott <richard@l...>
Date: 18 Aug 2003 09:36:42 -0400
Subject: Re: [openrisc] Next step after uClinux port?
Stupid question :
Have you ifconfig lo ?
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 08:47, Simon Srot wrote:
> hy kim wrote:
> >
> > hi,
> >
> > I am porting ucllinux on my fpga board with or1200. but i have some
> > problems.
> > Please help me. I'm first in this filed.
> >
> > <current status>
> > . ported orpmon and uclinux
> > . boot uclinux image via tftp of orpmon
> > . successfully ran 'sash', 'ifconfig','route' in userland , also my
> > applcation C code ( simple input/output to port)
> > . cache on both
> > . console : uart
> > . can boot with romfs or ramfs
> > . Clock :25MHz, RAM: SDRAM 64MB, ROM: 8MB
> >
> > <problem >
> > . can't ping to localhost with unreachable but can ping to another
> > machine with 20~50% loss
> > . and another problem is
>
> I don't know about localhost ping, I don't remember if I have ever tired
> this. Maybe this is a question for uClinux mailing list.
> For the 20-50% loss, this might be the speed problem.
>
> > - when an app program was compiled with
> > '-Werror-implicit-function-declaration',
> > can't compiled continuously with implicit error
> > - without '-Werror-implicit-function-declaration', and if run that
> > program on ulinux box
> > uclinux displays the message 'exec format error'
> > * I guess this problem is related with flat format and libarary but i am
> > sure not
>
> You are right, application should be compiled with
> -Werror-implicit-function-declaration switch turned on. You should have
> prototypes for all the functions. This is normally very easy to change.
>
> >
> > I searched internet or this mailing list for above problem but i could
> > not find the solution clearly.
> > Plz let me know what should i do ?
> >
> > best regards!
> >
> >
>
>
|
 |
Browse
