LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Advertise
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  • Find Resources
  • Job Opportunity
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Openrisc > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: Simon Srot <simons@o...>
    Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:47:36 +0200
    Subject: Re: [openrisc] Next step after uClinux port?
    Top

    hy kim wrote:
    > 
    > hi,
    > 
    > I am porting ucllinux on my fpga board with or1200. but i have some
    > problems.
    > Please help me. I'm first in this filed.
    > 
    > <current status>
    > . ported orpmon and uclinux
    > . boot uclinux image via tftp of orpmon
    > . successfully ran 'sash', 'ifconfig','route' in userland , also my
    > applcation C code ( simple input/output to port)
    > . cache on both
    > . console : uart
    > . can boot with romfs or ramfs
    > . Clock :25MHz, RAM: SDRAM 64MB, ROM: 8MB
    > 
    > <problem >
    > . can't ping to localhost with unreachable but can ping to another
    > machine with 20~50% loss
    > . and another problem is
    
    I don't know about localhost ping, I don't remember if I have ever tired
    this. Maybe this is a question for uClinux mailing list.
    For the 20-50% loss, this might be the speed problem.
    
    > - when an app program was compiled with
    > '-Werror-implicit-function-declaration',
    > can't compiled continuously with implicit error
    > - without '-Werror-implicit-function-declaration', and if run that
    > program on ulinux box
    > uclinux displays the message 'exec format error'
    > * I guess this problem is related with flat format and libarary but i am
    > sure not
    
    You are right, application should be compiled with
    -Werror-implicit-function-declaration switch turned on. You should have
    prototypes for all the functions. This is normally very easy to change.
    
    > 
    > I searched internet or this mailing list for above problem but i could
    > not find the solution clearly.
    > Plz let me know what should i do ?
    > 
    > best regards!
    > 
    > 
    
    
    

    ReferenceAuthor
    [openrisc] Next step after uClinux port?Hy kim

    Follow upAuthor
    Re: [openrisc] Next step after uClinux port?Richard Prescott

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.