|
Message
From: rcc@j...
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 17:47:00 -0100
Subject: Re: [openrisc] FW: [ECOS] Harvard architecture MLT files
Excellent - any idea when this will be ready?
In the meantime, which do you think is more complete? UC 2.95.3
version or OpenCores 3.2.3 version?
Thanks,
Robert
----- Original Message -----
From: Matjaz Breskvar <phoenix@o... >
To: openrisc@o...
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 15:24:21 +0200
Subject: Re: [openrisc] FW: [ECOS] Harvard architecture MLT files
>
>
> * Robert Cragie (rcc@j... ) wrote:
> > On the same note, whilst it's good to see the efforts done by
> Carlos and the
> > University of Cantabria, surely it would be better to put
> effort into
> > maintaining the GCC 3.2.3 port as opposed to the old 2.95.3
> port? I have
> > just compiled the latest eCos successfully on GCC 3.2.3 port
> (not run it yet
> > though) but I'm wondering if UC's efforts need to be included
> as well. Can
> > anyone give me the status on this?
>
> Carlos needs gcc-2.95.3, so he is updating it and getting it into
> sync
> with opencores ABI,... but this is just the first step; we are
> working
> on integrating best parts of UC port and opencores port with intend
> on
> merging it into opencores gcc-3.4 (and also latest stable
> reslease).
>
> regards,
> p.
>
|
 |
Browse
