LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Advertise
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  • Find Resources
  • Job Opportunity
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Openrisc > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: Matjaz Breskvar <phoenix@o...>
    Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 15:24:21 +0200
    Subject: Re: [openrisc] FW: [ECOS] Harvard architecture MLT files
    Top

    * Robert Cragie (rcc@j...) wrote:
    > On the same note, whilst it's good to see the efforts done by Carlos and the
    > University of Cantabria, surely it would be better to put effort into
    > maintaining the GCC 3.2.3 port as opposed to the old 2.95.3 port? I have
    > just compiled the latest eCos successfully on GCC 3.2.3 port (not run it yet
    > though) but I'm wondering if UC's efforts need to be included as well. Can
    > anyone give me the status on this?
    
    Carlos needs gcc-2.95.3, so he is updating it and getting it into sync
    with opencores ABI,... but this is just the first step; we are working
    on integrating best parts of UC port and opencores port with intend on
    merging it into opencores gcc-3.4 (and also latest stable reslease).
    
    regards,
    p.
    
    
    

    ReferenceAuthor
    [openrisc] FW: [ECOS] Harvard architecture MLT filesRobert Cragie

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.