LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Advertise
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  • Find Resources
  • Job Opportunity
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Openrisc > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: Simon Srot <simons@o...>
    Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 09:35:14 +0200
    Subject: Re: [openrisc] MMU support??
    Top

    True, that is why Linux port is on the way. At the beginning we chose
    uClinux, because the developing of the port is easier and it is more
    suitable for testing.
    
    Simon 
    
    rchow@p... wrote:
    > 
    > Hi,
    > 
    > Just curious why uclinux was picked as the OS to run with or1k?
    > Reason i'm asking is that uclinux doesn't have MMU support and
    > or1k does; so why not pick an OS that have MMU support to test
    > with or1k?
    > 
    > -regards
    > -Raymond
    > 
    
    
    

    ReferenceAuthor
    [openrisc] MMU support??Rchow

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.