<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<tt>Rudolf Usselmann wrote:<br>
</tt>
<blockquote cite="mid1082876201.1509.49.camel@linux8k" type="cite"><tt>On
Sat, 2004-04-24 at 19:35, Bogic Petrovic wrote:<br>
</tt>
<blockquote type="cite"><tt>rudi at asics dot ws</tt><tt>:<br>
<br>
</tt>
<blockquote type="cite"><tt>Sounds like a very interesting project.
Let me know if you need help, I<br>
might be able contribute.<br>
<br>
Suggestions:<br>
- Add an optional interface that would allow to implement
SoftRadio/SoftTv<br>
Thats basically just a high speed ADC, that would connect some generic<br>
tuner IF output. I believe all you need is about 80MHz, perhaps an<br>
option for a 125MHz ADC, would provide a wider selection ....<br>
- What kind of FPGA where you planning to include ? Using a Virtex Pro<br>
would give you a PowerPC ... might be a good idea ....<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
rudi<br>
<br>
rudi at asics dot ws<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</tt> </blockquote>
<tt>Thank you very much on your supportive E-mail message.
Actually, I would<br>
like to put, with your permission, your E-mail (with this reply) on the<br>
</tt></blockquote>
<!----><tt><br>
Sure, no problem, just please make it NON machine readable, by<br>
doing something like: rudi at asics dot ws ...<br>
<br>
</tt>
<blockquote type="cite"><tt>list, since it is very important for me
to make our communication<br>
accessible for those who might be interested to join our efforts. I hope<br>
that our discussion will foster emerging of other projects that will put<br>
engineers and developers together in creating open hardware projects.<br>
However, we can work together or separately. Of course, we can work<br>
together on developing digital interface for possible interconnections
of<br>
our open hardware devices.<br>
<br>
<br>
If I can help you to start a, your own, project, for example, DSP Radio<br>
PCI Card, please tell me. Your idea is (IMHO) great enough for<br>
new card.... with some extra features and high performances, of<br>
course... but, this still will be Radio Card.<br>
<br>
My plan is to make expansion connector with a standard interface<br>
(suggestion? Possible Wishbone... I don't know),<br>
on the top of card. With flat cable, it will be possible to make<br>
connection with your radio card, over digital interface, for mixing<br>
purposes, etc.<br>
At this point, it will be possible to connect video grabber cards, ATM<br>
interfaces, or any other idea, without PCI interface and/or operating<br>
system.<br>
I think that all-in-one cards is very helpful for learning and testing,<br>
but, this cards still not have professional value... because this is not<br>
the target for<br>
this cards, ...<br>
My idea is to make open hardware cards with valuable professional<br>
performances, but still DIYable.<br>
Note that we have very small back plate for connectors, two D-SUB 25<br>
(high density) is enough to<br>
fill this small space.... antenna connector?<br>
</tt></blockquote>
<!----><tt><br>
Hmm, I'm not sure I understand.</tt></blockquote>
<tt>ok, I'll try to explain.<br>
</tt>
<blockquote cite="mid1082876201.1509.49.camel@linux8k" type="cite"><tt>
Back plane connectors for<br>
a daughter card ? Yes, that would help.</tt></blockquote>
<tt>"picture" will be better than my interpretation</tt><tt>:<br>
<br>
</tt><tt>2.54mm</tt><tt> Exp. (parallel) Bus for any other card<br>
or set of cards (not faster than 25Mhz...)<br>
_ |<br>
| V<br>
+----------uuuuuuuuuuu----+<br>
| |<br>
Digital E| |<br>
I/O E| |<br>
| Audio DSP |<br>
| PCI card |<br>
Analog E| |<br>
I/O E| |<br>
+-----++++++++++++++++----+<br>
^ | ||||||||||||||||<br>
| ^<br>
| PCI Conn.<br>
|<br>
there is little space left for antenna connector...<br>
<br>
<br>
</tt>
<blockquote cite="mid1082876201.1509.49.camel@linux8k" type="cite"><tt>
I personally would<br>
prefer standard 2.54mm headers, those are cheap and easy to<br>
get buy.</tt></blockquote>
<tt>OK, this is also in my mind<br>
</tt>
<blockquote cite="mid1082876201.1509.49.camel@linux8k" type="cite"><tt>
I would arrange them such so you can attach a<br>
daughter card to the main PCI card, perhaps that will mean<br>
that it will take up two slots, but I thin that should not<br>
be a problem.</tt></blockquote>
<tt>Daughter card will open other questions... like: why we build cards
with specific target?<br>
Then we will buld PCI bridge card only (with daughter board connectors)?<br>
Also we must use fine pitch connectors for daughter card... this is not
cheap nor simple. (but not impossible)<br>
<br>
<br>
</tt>
<blockquote cite="mid1082876201.1509.49.camel@linux8k" type="cite"><tt>
There are also other options ...<br>
<br>
I still think you should have the option for a fast(er) ADC<br>
on the main board, so all we have to add is a tuner. Otherwise<br>
it's just as easy to make a board from scratch ...<br>
</tt></blockquote>
<tt>Ok, I think that we still able to make Radio card with same Spartan
and with fast ADC, tuner, etc.<br>
Most of Audio DSP card design will be reused in this case.<br>
<br>
Do you have any other feature or idea for DSP Radio target (except fast
ADC)?<br>
Memory needs, or other resources?<br>
</tt>
<blockquote cite="mid1082876201.1509.49.camel@linux8k" type="cite"><tt><br>
Best Regards,<br>
rudi <br>
========================================================<br>
ASICS.ws ::: Solutions for your ASIC/FPGA needs :::<br>
..............::: FPGAs * Full Custom ICs * IP Cores :::<br>
FREE IP Cores -> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.asics.ws/">http://www.asics.ws/</a> <- FREE EDA Tools<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</tt></blockquote>
<tt><br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
-boggy<br>
</tt><tt><br>
</tt>
</body>
</html>