LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Sponsors
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Cores > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: Tim Tait<tim.tait1@g...>
    Date: Mon Nov 28 07:30:02 CET 2005
    Subject: [oc] lack of pipeline in wishbone (resend)
    Top
    Does anyone else see it as a serious shortcoming that Wishbone does not
    support Address/Data pipelining?

    When connecting Wishbone to standard synchronous SRAM's (that register
    all address/control inputs) it makes it impossible to maintain
    throughput at full clock rate on random address sequences, even for
    those with flow-through data.

    The "FASM" Synchronous RAM model that is discussed in the spec if not
    actually synchonrous during read, only during write. This does not match
    any SSRAM IC I have encountered, or the SSRAM's inside recent Altera FPGA's.

    Is anyone working on an extension to WB to support pipelining?

    Tim
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL: attachment.htm

    Follow upAuthor
    [oc] lack of pipeline in wishbone (resend)Martin Schoeberl

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.