|
Message
From: vvucic at eunet.yu<vvucic@e...>
Date: Sat May 15 13:29:17 CEST 2004
Subject: FireWire + Re: [oc] Audio DSP PCI Card for mobile studio
Dear colleague,It is hard to be more technical in this way of cmmunication. It will
tajke a lot of space and time. However, my approach is that waht is
controllable is better.
Best wishes,
Vedran Vucic
----- Original Message -----
From: mikem@o...<mikem@o...>
To:
Date: Fri May 14 16:11:55 CEST 2004
Subject: FireWire + Re: [oc] Audio DSP PCI Card for mobile studio
> Vedran,
>
> > I found some your remarks as thought provoking in positive
> terms.
> > However, phase distortion, jitter, wander and some other
> effcts are
> > important when considering audio field. It is our idea to make
> > those
> > phenome controllabel with FPGA design as it is proved by some
> > designs that are already in use.
> > Thus, we prefer FPGA. However, if someone wants to use DSPs
> > that is fine too.
> What to use is of course your choice. However I have a feeling that
> you
> don't fully understand what you are embarking on. I do perfectly
> understand the importance of phase, jitter, etc. in the audio
> field, but
> how does it relate to choosing FPGA vs. DSP? What do you mean
when
> you are saying "to make this phenomenas controllable with
> FPGA"? What
> exactly has been proved by the exisiting designs that you are
> referring
> to? You have to be more specific and technical...
>
>
|
 |
Browse
