|
Message
From: gauthier_gault at yahoo.ca<gauthier_gault@y...>
Date: Wed Mar 31 17:30:27 CEST 2004
Subject: [oc] clean project list...
Hi, I am relatively new to opencores, and maybe this question has been arise already, but what about a ?sourceforge? interface for classifying projects, release and news?
Eric Gauthier ASIC Designer/Digital Engineer
----- Original Message ----- From: Miha Lampret<mihal@o...> To: Date: Wed Mar 31 11:49:36 CEST 2004 Subject: [oc] clean project list...
> Hi, > > We don't even need to put them into a new category because we > already have all > information about incomplete projects (last updated, project status > and > stage, number of project files). > In my opinion it is just a question how to change project browser. > By default > only ready to be used projects are displayed and on 'most popular' > page it is > the same. There are also other filters like programming language, > status, > category and people who know what they want to find will find it > quickly. > There is also search engine that can be restricted to projects, > project > downloads and cvs logs. > Most active page would be a good addition and I got this suggestion > form other > people too. If you have some other ideas about improving project > browser let > me know. Maybe we should add field for searching through project > titles and > descriptions. > regards, > Miha > On Wednesday 31 March 2004 10:37 am, Joachim Strombergson wrote: > > Aloha! > > > > Quoting Rudolf Usselmann <rudi@a...>: > > > Perhaps we need to add another category to the project > > > selection list: "Abandoned & Incomplete" > projects. You > > > would try to email the authors first, then a general > > > announcement to the list, and if no replies or direct > > > take overs, move it to the new category ! > > > > Good suggestion since that means that someone might someday > find interest > > and de-zombie such a project. Throwing them out would be a > shame since > > there are abandoned projects that actually have some good > ideas in them (at > > least I hope so). > >
|
 |