LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Advertise
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  • Job Opportunity
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Cores > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: Damjan Lampret<lampret@o...>
    Date: Sat Feb 7 04:45:55 CET 2004
    Subject: [oc] SoC Builder
    Top
    > I certainly want to have this project hosted by OpenCores. I tried to
    > register the project on Saturday or Sunday, but haven't gotten any
    > response. Should I try again?

    Did you managed to have it registered? Did you get a mailing list? Let me
    know if you have any problems.

    > That would be great. I had a long and not-so-friendly discussion with
    > my own boss about this project. It's not easy for upper managagement to
    > see why owning a proprietary SoC builder is less helpful than having a
    > common community one. For ViASIC, I won the argument on cost. We can't
    > afford to go it alone. For Flextronics, I would guess that FPGA
    > conversions would be a good argument, since it's easier to convert FPGA
    > designs to ASICs if they are built with open cores.
    > I get the feeling that there are several large companies out there
    > building proprietary SoC builders of their own, thinking that it will
    > give them a competitve advantage. If your IBM, it's hard to argue
    > against that, but for us smaller guys, we'd get crushed.
    >

    True. Flextronics is one of the major FPGA to ASIC conversion vendors and
    for conversion open source means easy to handle. However Flextronics also
    does SOCs (RTL-to-GDS flow). In this case the situation gets a little
    different. However Flextronics is very open minded and believes you need to
    be on the bleeding edge of changes or you will be run over by competition. I
    think open source has an excellent future also in hardware (to be more
    specific in cores and SoCs). IBM is now embracing Linux after many decades
    of pushing proprietary software. I think IBM in ten years will be doign the
    same with hardware intellectual property (cores and SoCs).

    > Wow! I noticed that the copyright says the manual is confidential. Is
    > this a problem? Is it ok if I read it?

    I have attached a more apropriate version. FLINT as a whole is still
    proprietary, but copy of the manual you can read it and if majority thinks
    this could be good underlaying technology for the SoC Builder, then I will
    talk to Flex management.

    regards,
    Damjan
    -------------- next part --------------
    A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
    Name: Flint Toolkit Reference.rtf
    Type: application/msword
    Size: 503688 bytes
    Desc: not available
    Url : FlintToolkitReference.wiz

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.