LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Advertise
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  • Job Opportunity
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Cores > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: "Sudarshan" <sudarshan@g...>
    Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 10:21:07 +0530
    Subject: Re: [oc] i386 legally
    Top

    Hi
    
    This is country dependent, in India you can do without any prob.
    
    Sudy
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Niclas Hedhman <niclas@h...>
    To: <cores@o...>
    Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2003 1:00 AM
    Subject: Re: [oc] i386 legally
    
    
    > On Thursday 22 May 2003 06:51 pm, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
    > > Niclas Hedhman wrote:
    > > > 80386 was released ~1987, so patents would be covered for another 8-10
    > > > years. Exactly what patents there are on the 80386 is hard to know
    > > > without a search.
    > >
    > > Again, IANAL, but this is my understanding of things:
    > >
    > > a) A patent cannot be filed more than 1 year after the invention was
    > > offered for sale;
    >
    > I think this may be country dependent. Sweden for sure is that the patent
    must
    > be filed before it has been otherwise published, in print or in product.
    >
    > > b) Patents are valid until 20 years after date of file, *or* 17 years
    > > after date of issue (in the U.S. only and only for patents filed before
    > > some time in the late '90s.)
    >
    > Ohh. I thought it was 25 years. Nevertheless, 17years after issue, is
    another
    > interesting part, since many patents take years from filing to issuance,
    the
    > IC for instance was ~2 decades.
    >
    > > It's thus unlikely that if a processor was released in 1987 that there
    > > would be any valid patents after 2008.
    >
    > OTOH, what on 80386 was NEW? ;o) v86 mode perhaps? Who needs that
    nowadays?
    >
    > Niclas
    > 
    >
    
    
    
    
    

    ReferenceAuthor
    Re: [oc] Verilog coding style for Open Cores-RTL - Case in pointSHA1Marco Antonio Simon Dal Poz
    Re: [oc] i386 legallyNiclas Hedhman
    Re: [oc] i386 legallyH Peter Anvin
    Re: [oc] i386 legallyNiclas Hedhman

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.