|
Message
From: "Todd Fleming" <todd@f...>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 15:39:39 -0500
Subject: Re: [oc] Verilog coding style for Open Cores-RTL - Case in point SHA1
> On Tue, 2003-05-20 at 17:42, paul wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm new here. I see most of the projects are done in Verilog. Why Verilog?
> > Most school teach VHDL.... My university teach VHDL.
> > I really don't want to juggle two languages.
>
> You should ask your school (and the other schools you are
> referring too), most of the industry is using Verilog.
> Search the archives, I have posted a message a while back
> in which the Synopsys CEO makes a statement that VHDL is
> dead. Which is probably not quite true, but shows you that
> the industry is at least trying to steer in to one direction ...
>
> Regards,
> rudi
Hello! I've been lurking on this list for several weeks now and thought I'd
poke my head up here. I graduated from Virginia Tech. Like most schools, VT
taught VHDL at the time but not Verilog. Now that I experiment with FPGAs I
use Verilog; for some reason I just like it better. I don't know about other
schools, but I do know why VT taught VHDL. A couple of the professors were on
the VHDL specification committee. They are also the ones who taught the
courses and wrote the book we used. There's a definite advantage to this; the
professors were able to explain not just the how's, but also the why's of
VHDL. I don't see it as a major problem that I prefer a language I learned on
my own; the concepts are similar enough that it was worth taking the VHDL
course when I was in school.
Todd Fleming
flemingcnc.com
|
 |
Browse
