LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Advertise
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  • Job Opportunity
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Cores > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: John Sheahan <jrsheahan@o...>
    Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 08:44:50 +1000
    Subject: Re: [oc] Trade off between area and power ?
    Top

    On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 09:53:54PM +0700, Rudolf Usselmann wrote:
    > So as you see the two multipliers at half speed consume
    > the same amount on power as the one multiplier at full
    > speed.
    > 
    > If you want to save even more area you can design a
    > bit-slice (or digit-slice) multiplier and run it even
    > higher clock ... depends how far your process will go.
    
    this does assume the fast clock can be generated with zero power 
    penalty, which is unlikely to be the case.
      
    Cever clock gating (the clock, not a CE) is a good way to save
    power, but is hard to do well and to analyze. 
    john
    
    
    

    ReferenceAuthor
    [oc] Trade off between area and power ?NansonHuang
    Re: [oc] Trade off between area and power ?Rudolf Usselmann

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.