|
Message
From: "Jim Dempsey" <tapedisk@a...>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 07:46:15 -0600
Subject: Re: [oc] Beyond Transmeta...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Herveille" <richard@a...>
To: <cores@o...>
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:22 AM
Subject: Re: [oc] Beyond Transmeta...
>
> In brains terms thinking is pattern matching. It's a matter of being aware
> that it happens (cognitive versus non-cognitive),
There is a matter of definition of terms. i.e. define "thinking". My
preference
is to take a broader definition. Much of my thinking is non-cognitive.
However
someone else's definition might be "Only that portion which manifests itself
in percieved spoken words". Both definitions are valid assuming agreement
is reached before hand in discussion with others.
> > > At least the brain can imagine that it is hiding it's own fallacies.
> >
> > Not so, my brain certainly has no such alleged fallancies ! ;-)
>
I used to think I was right all the time, now know I am.
corilary
I used to be indecisive, ... now I am not so sure.
> A good example of a brain hiding it's fallacies :-))
>
> > Seriously, it would be interesting to know how much thought that went
> > into different matters, and how much pattern matching and so on the
> > brains does.
> >
>
> Even more interresting is the left/right side story. It appears that one
side
> responses to an event, and the other side tries to explain the reaction.
It is kind of like being married. But which one is your better half?
|
 |
Browse
